Bila membicarakan tentang planet kita hanya tahu tentang 9 planet. Iaitu Mercury,Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. Yang paling terakhir di temui ialah Pluto sekitar 1930an. Tetapi tahukah kita bahawa saintis mengatakan kemungkinan besar ada 18000 planet serupa dengan planet bumi di seluruh galaksi dalam sistem solar yang terdekat. Serupa tetapi tidak di ketahui adakah berpenghuni atau tidak. Namun itu pendapat sesetengah pengkaji bintang. Terdapat beribu-ribu lagi pengkaji yang mungkin mempunyai teori-teori mereka sendiri.
Jika di ukur kepada maha luasnya milky way ini (keseluruhan galaksi cakrewala) kemungkinan ada berbilion, bertrilion bintang2 di langit yang tak terkira banyaknya. Banyaknya bintang dan planet di angkasa umpama pasir yang berterbangan di angkasa. Bumi ini adalah sekecil-kecilnya planet yang mungkin sebesar zarah halus di mata kasar. Maha luasnya galaksi ciptaan tuhan yang tak mapu difikirkan oleh manusia. Saintis mentafsirkan kelahiran dunia ini dari letupan teori big bang mereka dengan lubang hitam yang menjadi petunjuk awal sejarah peradapan manusia. Tetapi itu semuanya adalah teori dangkal yang sebenarnya cuba merendahkan apa yang sebenarnya berlaku. Dalam al-quran menyebut tentang kelahiran tamadun manusia dari Adam dan Hawa yang diturunkan dari syurga. Bukannya lahir dari letupan dan juga kelahiran beruk menurut Darwin.
Untuk mempertajamkan minda dan mengetahui betapa besarnya alam ini lihat sahaja teori sains yang cuba dihuraikan oleh ramai saintis seperti di bawah ini. Kita wajib mengumpul ilmu sebanyak yang mungkin. Ambil mana yang boleh untuk dijadikan sedikit pengetahuan. Mana yang tidak benar kita tolak. Jangan jadikan kita manusia yang hanya menanti berita sampai. Jadilah manusia yang terbuka yang mencari pengetahuan seumpama luasnya galaksi bimasakti ini.
“Stuff your eyes with wonder, live as if you’d drop dead in ten seconds. See the world. It’s more fantastic than any dream made or paid for in factories.” –Ray Bradbury
It wasn’t all that long ago — back when I was a boy — that the only planets we knew of were the ones in our own Solar System. The rocky planets, our four gas giants, and the moons, asteroids, comets, and kuiper belt objects (which was only Pluto and Charon at the time) were all that we knew of.
Image credit: NASA’s Solar System Exploration, http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/index.cfm.
But these were just the worlds around our Sun, which houses (according to current definition) eight planets. Our Sun is just one of an estimated two-to-four hundred billion stars in our Milky Way galaxy, and looking up towards the night sky, one can’t help but wonder how many of those stars have planets of their own, and what those worlds are like.
Image credit: Free Roaming Photography, by Mike Cavaroc.
There are a vast variety of stars out there in our galaxy. Our Sun is just one example — a G-class star — of seven different main types.
Image credit: Wikipedia user Kieff; annotations by me.
We may think of our Sun as being typical and on the relatively dim side, since a disproportionate number of stars visible to our eyes in the night sky are O, B, and A-class stars. But in reality, the Sun is more massive and intrinsically brighter than 95% of stars in our galaxy. The red dwarf stars — M-class stars — which are no more than 40% the mass of our Sun, make up 3 out of every 4 stars that are out there.
What’s more than that, our Sun exists in isolation; it is not gravitationally bound to any other stars. But that is not necessarily how stars exist in the galaxy, either.
Image credit: VISTA infrared survey, ESO / J. Borissova.
Stars can be clustered together in twos (binary stars), threes (trinaries), or groups/clusters containing anywhere from hundreds to many hundreds of thousands of stars.
My point is this: if you want to accurately estimate how many planets there are in our galaxy, you can’t just take the number of planets we find around our star and multiply it by the number of stars in our galaxy. That’s a naïve estimate that we’d make in the absence of evidence. But just for fun, that’d give us somewhere around two-to-three trillion planets in our galaxy. And as we know from our own Solar System, there’s a great variety of what the surfaces of those planets could look like.
Image composite: credit Mike Malaska. For individual image credits, see lower left.
But over the past two decades, we’ve been looking. We’ve been looking with a few different methods, in fact, and the two most prolific are the “stellar wobble” method, where you can infer the mass-and-radius of a planet (or set of planets) around a star by observing how it “wobbles” gravitationally over long periods of time:
Image credit: European Southern Observatory.
And the transit method, where the light coming from a distant star is partially blocked by the disk of a planet in its solar system passing in front of it.
Image credit: ESA / NASA’s Solar And Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), 2006.
It’s important to recognize, when we do this, that we will not see the vast majority of planets that are out there. Take NASA’s Kepler Mission, for instance, which has discovered hundreds (if notthousands) of planets by looking at a field-of-view containing around 100,000 stars. But that does not mean that there are only a few planets-per-hundred-stars. Consider the following: if Kepler were looking at our Solar System, and our Solar System was oriented randomly with respect to our perspective, these are the odds that the alignment would be good enough to observe a transit of our star by one of our planets.
|Planet||Degree Range (out of 180)||% chance of good alignment|
|Mercury||1.37 degrees||0.76% chance|
|Venus||0.738 degrees||0.41% chance|
|Earth||0.533 degrees||0.30% chance|
|Mars||0.320 degrees||0.18% chance|
|Jupiter||0.101 degrees||0.056% chance|
|Saturn||0.0556 degrees||0.031% chance|
|Uranus||0.0277 degrees||0.015% chance|
|Neptune||0.0177 degrees||0.0098% chance|
Now you may think those are not-so-good odds, but you don’t even know the half of it. Mercury and Mars are too small, meaning they don’t block enough of the Sun’s light, to be detectable with Kepler, and the four outer planets, despite their large sizes, take too long to orbit for Kepler to observe more than one transit, a necessity for a planetary candidate.
So this means that if Kepler were looking at 100,000 stars identical to our own, it would have found 410 stars with a total of 700 planets around them.
Illustration credit: NASA / Jason Rowe, Kepler Mission.
But as of today, Kepler has found over 11,000 stars with at least one planetary candidate, and over 18,000 potential planets around those stars, with periods ranging from 12 hours up to 525 days. In other words, there are:
- a huge variety of planetary systems out there, most of which are very different from our own,
- orbiting a wide variety of stars, including binary and trinary systems,
- and we are only seeing the ones that are large enough, orbiting their stars close enough, that also have unlikely, fortuitous alignments with respect to our line-of-sight.
You may have read this week that there are at least 100-to-200 billion planets in our Milky Way, and that’s true, but that’s not an estimate; that’s a lower limit. If you instead were to make an estimate, you’d get a number that’s at least one (and more like two, if you’re willing to make inferences about outer planets) orders of magnitude higher: closer to ten trillion planets in our galaxy, alone!
Image credit: ESO / M. Kornmesser.
In other words, based on what we’ve seen so far, most stars are likely to have planets, and based on what we’ve seen in the inner solar systems of the ones that do, a large fraction of them are likely to have more rocky planets in their inner solar systems than even our own has, to say nothing of the outer solar system!
Image credit: J. Pinfield / RoPACS network / University of Hertfordshire.
This doesn’t even include orphan planets (without a parent star), which we know exist, even if we don’t know their numbers yet. Over time, we’ll continue to learn more and refine our estimates, but right now, there are at least about as many planets as there are stars in our galaxy, and quite possibly many, many more than even eight times that number.
Our solar system may turn out to be average, slightly above average, or somewhat below average; we’re still not sure. But regardless of which way it goes, we’re talking about trillions of planets in our galaxy alone. And remember, our galaxy isn’t alone in the Universe.
Image credit: NASA, ESA, G. Illingworth, D. Magee, and P. Oesch (University of California, Santa Cruz), R. Bouwens (Leiden University), and the HUDF09 Team.
With at least 200 billion galaxies out there (and possibly even more), we’re very likely talking about a Universe filled with around 1024 planets, or, for those of you who like it written out, around 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets in our observable Universe.
That number’s only going to get more accurate, but I’m tired of people giving the lowball-estimate when it’s eminently likely that there are so many more. Let’s keep looking, for not just planets, but for water, oxygen, and signs of life. With all of those chances, we’re bound to get lucky if we persevere and look hard enough!